Remember when they wanted to change the recipe of Coca Cola? Very bad idea. If there’s one golden rule in marketing, it’s not to mess around with well-established household brands. You may surprise the customer with brand extensions – diet coke, cherry coke, coke zero – but you never ever alienate him from the core of the brand.
Nation brands are just as precious. Their main asset is consistency over time. There may be some negative stereotypes around, there may be some sporadic unpleasant phenomena, but there are some strong positive connotations that will never change.
What the British (both government and citizens) do not seem to realise is that they have allowed UKIP, with all its rhetoric of ‘defending’ the UK’s national interest, to start damaging the core of the national brand. Not through their hatred of the EU – within Europe, Euroscepticism is a widely shared and perfectly legitimate attitude; outside of Europe, the EU is poorly understood anyway. It’s the obsession with immigration – imposed by UKIP on the British public debate and nurtured despite better knowledge by a particularly spineless government – that will become a reputation disaster for the UK.
In France, the semantics of British Euroscepticism don’t raise eyebrows anymore. Even less so since the French themselves sent 24 Front National MEPs to Brussels and Strasbourg. But the new ‘obsession’ with immigration is a different story. And it has now made it to French mainstream evening news. Last Monday evening, the five million French who watched the Journal télévisé on France 2 were confronted not only with the election of Mark Reckless, but also with the following spontaneous statements of some inhabitants of Kent:
- An elderly gentleman: ‘I’m sick and tired of being a second-class citizen in my own country.’
- A gas station customer: ‘Immigration is a concern, definitely. It needs to be stopped, it’s out of control, isn’t it?’
- An angry lady on the marketplace: ‘We give them houses when they come here, we give them money…’
- A ten-year old schoolboy in a classroom discussion: ‘The immigrants come to our country. They ask for help and they get benefits. UKIP says they’re stealing our money.’
Four representative of mainstream middle-class, definitely not impoverished proletarians in need of a scapegoat.
What the report did not even clearly explain is that the immigration these people are so concerned about is not the huddled masses from what used to be called ‘third-world countries’, but citizens from European member-states.
As numerous image surveys have shown, Britain has always been considered worldwide as a tolerant, open, multicultural society. In the global Anholt-GfK Nation Brands Index the UK has always figured among the top countries. If this outright xenophobic discourse, which seems to take hold of the British public debate and which is likely to sound even shriller and more paranoid during the forthcoming election campaign, is perceived elsewhere as representative of British public opinion, the harm done to the precious UK brand image will be considerable (much more so than Scottish independence would have been). Precisely because it will be no longer perceived as the antics of a political fringe group, but as a change in fundamental society values.
Leaving the EU is one thing. That’s just packaging. Changing the basic recipe is another one.
Albrecht Sonntag, EU-Asia Institute, ESSCA School of Management